Dr. Phil – April 29 2021 – Thursday

Dr. Phillip C. McGraw’s show draws on his 25 years of experience in psychology, sociology and observation. Beginning his TV career as the resident expert on human behavior on Oprah Winfrey’s daily talk show, Dr. Phil continues to deal with real issues in his blunt style.

Watched the show? Join the discussion and leave a comment below!

About Dr. Phil

Dr. Phillip C. McGraw’s show draws on his 25 years of experience in psychology, sociology and observation. Beginning his TV career as the resident expert on human behavior on Oprah Winfrey’s daily talk show, Dr. Phil continues to deal with real issues in his blunt style.

Latest Episodes of Dr. Phil

Television in the United States

The main United States networks are:

  • NBC (National Broadcasting Corporation)
  • CBS (Columbia Broadcasting System)
  • ABC (American Broadcasting Company)
  • Fox (Fox Broadcasting Company)
  • CW Television Network
  • PBS (Public Broadcasting Service)

You will find articles on all your favourite TV shows on every network, everyday on TV Everyday!


2 Responses

  1. Macrina Wiesen says:

    Dear Dr. Phil,

    I have seen that others have made similar comments to what I thought in regards to the loss of the poor little baby. In short I think that the young woman knows something about it and is hiding what she knows. I do not think it has to do with her husband having done anything but I suspect she did and perhaps had problems with the baby and not so good at coping or parenting the child. I even wonder, when I saw photos of the young man with his son if the young woman was perhaps jealous of the close relationship he had with the little baby and took her emotions out on the baby when her husband was not around. But when around showed an entirely different aspect. I wonder if something happened when she was out with the baby and maybe alone on her way back before she dropped him back at home that day before going off to have dinner at her mother’s without her husband and the baby. Also he wanted some time with his son which speaks volumes of how much he loved the little guy and on the other hand she wanted time away from the baby to have time on her own without having to look after him. As for not waking her husband to tell him she was taking him to the hospital, I think she may have told him later they could only have one person anyway…but I think that she did not want to be alone with her husband on the way there because she was afraid she might say something that might give away what had happened or what she had done.
    Even on your show she was swallowing hard all the time, as if she was afraid she might say something that might get her caught up but she said many things that were questionable. As to how would she not know he was eating 4 ounces at each meal and instead said it was around 8 when the records of the day he was taken into the emergency she knew he was eating 4 ounces at a time. What mother would not remember how much her poor little baby was eating or have any heart or show it when talking about it.
    I think she was not able to manage and that she is hiding what happened and took the baby home and dropped him off and hoped that it would be okay and no one would know she had shaken him or done something to him when she was coming back home with him. I think the people who need to be spoken to are the grandma whom she went to see – either her mother or her grandmother and find out what went on when the baby was with them and whether he was being fussy or crying and perhaps the young woman could not settle him and was on her own with him while he was in the state.

    I do not think it was the father who did it. I do not think he thinks his wife did it, or perhaps is trying to look the other way and is in denial that she would since when he was with her and the baby he only saw her being somewhat loving of the baby. But even in a picture where she is holding the baby she is holding the baby away from her. I know someone who does not like animals but who got a puppy because others in the family wanted the puppy. When the person who did not like animals took a picture with the puppy they were trying to show they liked the puppy but were holding the puppy at arms length and away from them. Anyone who is an animal lover would be able to tell that the person does not like animals because those who do would have held the puppy up close to them and let the puppy be nuzzling into them. So when I saw the picture I did of the young woman and the baby I immediately thought of that other scenario. Now there may be more pictures of the young woman with the baby which would perhaps indicate differently but that one which I did see, that is what it reminded me of. As well, as I said, perhaps she was jealous of the baby and the relationship which the father had with his son and felt that the baby was taking the attention away from her and their relationship and so when the dad was not around was resentful of the baby and impatient with him. It is truly heartbreaking to think of the poor little baby. Of course I feel sad for both of them and all who lost the baby, but I agree with what others were commenting, the response of they young woman was “off” and she did never blink and seemed to be concerned about making sure she did not say something which would raise questions or get her into trouble or give her away. She is perhaps relieved it is her husband who is the subject of the investigation and that is a really good position she put him into too in order perhaps to not get caught herself and to give herself an alibi after doing something to the baby and then leaving the baby with him for that time.
    Nor does she seemed to be concerned that he might have done something to their child, and to me that means she knows he didn’t – otherwise if she had thought so then she would have perhaps been one of the first ones to raise the concern and not want to be around him…but instead she is apparently pregnant once more and so that suggests she had no concern about him as a father or what he might do. So that to me suggests she knows what happened with her son and it had nothing to do with the father or his relationship with the baby.
    I hope the truth will come out and there will be justice forthe cute little baby who was mistreated and lost his life, as well as for those who also lost him through no fault of theirs.

  2. Macrina Wiesen says:

    Of course this is based on what I heard and saw and my own opinion since there does seem to be something not right in regards to the whole situation. Perhaps the young woman is in shock or in need of some grief counselling or something….I do not know but it is a tragedy as to what happened. And if she does know what happened, and knows it was not intentional but that there is some need for some parenting skills then hopefully she will be honest about it, so that whomever can get the help they need and that things will be better for the future as opposed to thinking that things will be different on its own without any sort of intervention. I feel sad for all of them who lost the baby but know that the only way for things to be better is for the truth to come out and if there is a need for some help then they will be able to get it.

Discuss the Show

TV Everyday